k2.1 performance core thruster set vs. wct's

[kdropin]

how's the feel of the wct's compared to the k2.1's? looseness, drive, pivot?

[iggy]

WCT has smaller area and base, it's a bit more upright than the K2.1 hence I believe the WCT will be a it looser. The rake seems to be pretty similar

399
Dimensions:
Base: 4.33" 110mm
Depth: 4.53" 115mm
Area: 15.23"² 9824mm²
Sweep: 32º

400Front:

Height: 4.50 in, 11.40 cm
Base: 4.37 in, 11.10 cm
Area: 14.89 sq in, 96.06 sq cm

Rear:

Height: 4.35 in, 11.05 cm
Base: 4.25 in, 10.80 cm
Area: 14.10 sq in, 90.97 sq cm

[core personal training]

yep...too loose for me where as the 2.1's were all i needed in fcs...hard to compare fully though as you cant put them both in the same board..(unless you buy 2 indentical firewires with both plug types)...

[iggy]

Check this out
http://www.futuresfins.com/school-template.php

[Chris]

good stuff there iggy!

[Spudley]

As you would expect, the Techflex WCT's are stiffer and drivier than K2.1. The K2.1 felt more playful in everday average beachies. I tried the normal honeycomb WCT and they felt like a bit of a nothing fin, not realdrivey and not real loose..