They look fairly similar, though I'm thinking the Jacknife might be the slightly more refined board. What are their differences?
Announcement
Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Jacknife vs Activator
Page Title Module
Move
Remove
Collapse
-
Elite
- Dec 2011
- 805
-
Jesus is coming, look busy!
Moving forward or just spinning faster? 6'0 90kg
5'8 RF Vanguard 32.2L FCS R2 quad
6'0 FST Dominator 34.8L FCS PC SF4 quad + stabiliser
6'0 FST Spitfire 34.9L FCS PC R2 quad + stabiliser
6'2 FST Jacknife 33.3L FCS PC quad front/rear TC Redlines/TC Aqualines
6'2 FST Hellfire 33.7L FCS PC R2 quad + stabiliser (x 2, yes 1 here, 1 there!)
6'4 FST Alternator 34.?L FCS PG7
6'5 FST Hellrazor 33.5L FCS R2 quad + stabiliser
6'7 FST Hellrazor 36.5L FCS R2 thruster
Tags: None
-
Jacknife - tweeked Futura - more refined
Activator - tweaked dominator - more waves
= tough choice!
-
What is the rocker like between the two.
I know the Dom has a relatively flat entry rocker...
I read that the Futura also "lower entry rocker", but not sure how it compares...
Mahalo for your assistance!
Comment
-
I have a Dom and Futura, the base for the Activator and Jacknife respectively. I don't actually think there's an awful lot of difference in the rocker. The Futura/Jacknife would have a bit more nose rocker, but both have a pretty straight rocker. The Futura/Jacknife is, however, a much more refined board overall than a Dom/Activator - much thinner nose and tail and much more sensitive rails.
Comment
-
jacknife definitely more refined. Think more in line with the alternator while the activator is more in line with the dominator...
Comment

Comment