Announcement Announcement Module
No announcement yet.
vanguard - quad rear positions different - FCS to Futures Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
Conversation Detail Module
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vanguard - quad rear positions different - FCS to Futures

    just wondering if the rear quad fin positions are different in fcs to futures. I've only seen futures up close.
    From what i understand, (correct me if I'm wrong) with Futures the inside flange of the box is cut down a little, so that it can fit snug against the channel,
    but i don't see how this could be achieved with any of the 3 fcs boxes. So are the fcs boxes set further towards the rail or more forward towards the nose ?

  • #2
    pretty sure FCS offer different angles of plugs to enable them to fit different boards with differing levels of concaves.

    Now I could be wrong here, but it's just my understanding.

    To be safe, just take the better option that Tomo recommends and grab the futures boxes.


    • #3
      futures are just better


      • iggy
        iggy commented
        Editing a comment
        Yesssssssssssir, more selection, more thinking involved, foils are way more advanced in FUTURES. IMO

    • #4
      The FCS plugs are shaved down into the channel too. I prefer futures for thruster but can't say I'd want 5 of those plugs on my boards.


      • #5
        I have FCS and the plugs are fine they run flush with the channel contours. Take a risk! You're already shark bait!