1 or 2 split paddle pop / ice cream sticks in front or behind the fins helps keep them in place. Similarly small random bits of plastic spoons work well and last longer too. Pity about adding the extra weight though ; )
Hopefully the new system won't require the same expensive, hi-tech aftermarket adjustments.
That issue is easily overcome .. You just hold the fin firmly .. Lightly tighten the first screw without the fin moving ... Then do the same with the next screw and then alternately progressively tighten both screws .. Just go little by little with each screw while holding the fin in place .. EasyOriginally Posted by Slowman
Fan, I was talking specifically about once the box has been filed out to give you that 5-7mm adjustment but yes it works just normally to stop that 2mm movement too. I guess I could have written it more clearly and in more detail but time...
Jesus is coming, look busy!
Moving forward or just spinning faster?
5'8 RF Vanguard 32.2L FCS H3 quad
6'0 FST Dominator 34.8L FCS PC SF4 quad + stabiliser
6'0 FST Spitfire 34.9L FCS PC R2 quad + stabiliser
6'2 FST Jacknife 33.3L FCS PC quad front/rear TC Redlines/TC Aqualines
6'2 FST Hellfire 33.7L FCS PC R2 quad + stabiliser (x 2, yes 1 here, 1 there!)
6'4 FST Alternator 34.?L FCS PG7
6'7 FST Hellrazor 36.5L FCS R2 thruster
------------------------------------------
6'5 FST Hellrazor 33.5L FCS coming
Soooo.. what happened to the video??
It got pulled. The system is being released this summer so I imagine lots of info and videos will surface in the coming months.
6'0" - 77kg - 170lbs
502R FPT - DL front DS rears
506D RVG - Soar Powerbase DL
600Q FTJ/CBD - Soar Powerbase DL
604R FFE - Soar Powerbase DL
I think that is hilarious...as if all of the pros are going to say it sucks...of course they will say its great...they get paid to. I have numerous DVD's of a handful of the very same pros talk about how glass ons are the only way to go. Lets be abundantly clear..this is a marketing attempt to create a new system that is not as easily copied as the old system. There is very little downside in using a key versus snapping one out with your hands. Sorry, but that just made me laugh.
The Origin system that looks like the Powerbase concept taken up a level looks good.
As for the FCSII, have a longer section of the fin in the box is going to improve the base stiffness, it's just going to come down to whether the QC and tolerances are tight enough in the manufacturing process to keep the fit really snug because if there's any play I'm guessing you'll have some movement with no way of tightening.
Also what about wear and tear? Ok for pros changing boards on a regular basis but for the consumer keeping the same board for a number of years it needs to be able to last.
I agree with Fan, this new system is all about stopping the number of cheaper copies. I'm betting that not only have they patented the plug this time but also the design of the fin base which fits into it. The whole FCS marketing over the last few years has been all about identifying 'Genuine FCS'.
Last edited by prjwebb; 03-24-2013 at 03:44 AM.
To be honest, I would just as soon go back to the new original version of FCS - without movement fore and aft - before taking up the new version.
I do think however that it could be -from some people- at odds to suggest that you would have to be a pro to notice a difference of less than 0.5 to 1 litre difference in volume but that a fin that sits 0.5mm away from the board is a massive issue even if your highest performance board is a spitfire. ( I actually don't think anyone has done that. Just want to create more discussion really)
PRJ and Sarge.. at different points but your very valid views confirm that Futures has an advantage over FCS. Hell, even FCS say its a positive to have more of the fin base in the board...smacks of desperation to me . Macquarie Bank owns FCS (or Surf Hardware Int) so the marketing machine with the sole aim of protecting market share will be scrambling.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote