Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: CBD - Spitfire

  1. #1
    Certified
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2

    CBD - Spitfire

    Have been surfing a 6'6" Spitfire for several yrs. and love the board (surfed it last yr in solid oh Fiji & it was amazing) I need a board with lots of volume as I am 5'11, 225lbs, int/adv surfer. Even though getting older, I still can rip in good surf but I need a board that floats me and paddles well. Here's the question I have, what would be the overall effect if the Spitfire's nose and tail were reduced by the maximum on CBD (-.025 in the nose and -.05 in the tail). The new Unibrow looks great, but based on volume #s, I'm looking at a minimum 6'10". Thanks for the help

  2. #2
    Elite Firewire Liaison prjwebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cornwall UK
    Posts
    2,654
    It'll create more curve in the outline which will reduce the turning radius but also reduce the drive you get off the rail.
    6'0" - 77kg - 170lbs
    502R FPT - DL front DS rears
    506D RVG - Soar Powerbase DL
    600Q FTJ/CBD - Soar Powerbase DL
    604R FFE - Soar Powerbase DL

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by prjwebb View Post
    It'll create more curve in the outline which will reduce the turning radius but also reduce the drive you get off the rail.
    Ahh more curve in the outline makes it turn tighter but can reduce speed and drive...not sure I agree with you PRJ.

  4. #4
    Elite Firewire Liaison prjwebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cornwall UK
    Posts
    2,654
    What effect would you say it would have then?
    Straight rail line = Drive
    Curved outline = Looser
    Which part do you disagree with?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by prjwebb View Post
    What effect would you say it would have then?
    Straight rail line = Drive
    Curved outline = Looser
    Which part do you disagree with?
    It might be just in the way you said it or I interpreted it...by reduce the turning radius you mean it turns tighter or less tight???

  6. #6
    Elite Firewire Liaison prjwebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cornwall UK
    Posts
    2,654
    as in smaller radius, tighter turn. haha
    6'0" - 77kg - 170lbs
    502R FPT - DL front DS rears
    506D RVG - Soar Powerbase DL
    600Q FTJ/CBD - Soar Powerbase DL
    604R FFE - Soar Powerbase DL

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by prjwebb View Post
    as in smaller radius, tighter turn. haha
    Then we agree !!

  8. #8
    Elite Firewire Liaison prjwebb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cornwall UK
    Posts
    2,654
    Ha! Phew, I thought for a second that everything I was starting to understand about surfboard design was a lie!
    6'0" - 77kg - 170lbs
    502R FPT - DL front DS rears
    506D RVG - Soar Powerbase DL
    600Q FTJ/CBD - Soar Powerbase DL
    604R FFE - Soar Powerbase DL

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by prjwebb View Post
    Ha! Phew, I thought for a second that everything I was starting to understand about surfboard design was a lie!
    Dont worry, there is still an enormous amount of theory out there...some of it is either controversial or at best unproven...

  10. #10
    Certified
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2
    Ok so based on the assumption that a curved outline is looser, will there be a noticeable effect if one was to reduce the Spitfire's nose by the maximum of -.025 but not adjust the tail. My objective is to keep all the great attributes of the Spitfire and possibly make it a little loser. With that in mind, is it worthwhile to reduce both the nose & tail, just the tail or just the nose. I don't want to jeopardize paddling and planing of the Spitfire by to much, but if the CDB adjustments will allow me to loosen it up while still providing the volume I need, then I think that's the way I order it. Thanks for your assistance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •